Approach Summary
Monotonic decreasing stack on nums2. Store (element -> next greater) in a map. Answer queries for nums1 from the map.
Solve it yourself before revealing the code
DSA interviews test reasoning from brute force to optimal. Think through the constraints first.
Full Solution & Approach
To solve Next Greater Element I optimally, we apply the monotonic stack algorithmic strategy. Monotonic decreasing stack on nums2. Store (element -> next greater) in a map. Answer queries for nums1 from the map. A brute-force simulation or exhaustive search would lead to prohibitive polynomial or exponential time complexity, violating FAANG interview limits. Instead, the key algorithmic invariant is to maintain state incrementally across elements without redundant passes. We start by initializing our tracking structures and boundaries. As we iterate through the input dataset, each element is evaluated against our transition rules: whenever our target condition is met, we capture the current optimal state and update our tracking pointers or memoized lookup table. If the current state violates feasibility constraints, we systematically adjust our window, boundary, or search partition to restore validity. This structured progression guarantees that each state is examined in amortized O(n) time, utilizing O(n) auxiliary memory.
Time Complexity: O(n) — each element or state is traversed and evaluated in bounded amortized time without redundant reprocessing. Space Complexity: O(n) — allocated for auxiliary tracking structures, recursion call stack, or state caches.
Solution Code
Solution
import java.util.*;
class Solution {
// Time: O(n), Space: O(n)
public int nextGreaterElementI(int[] nums) {
if (nums == null || nums.length == 0) return 0;
Deque<Integer> stack = new ArrayDeque<>();
int res = 0;
for (int val : nums) {
while (!stack.isEmpty() && stack.peek() < val) {
res = Math.max(res, val - stack.pop());
}
stack.push(val);
}
return res > 0 ? res : stack.size();
}
}#include <vector>
#include <stack>
#include <algorithm>
using namespace std;
class Solution {
public:
// Time: O(n), Space: O(n)
int nextGreaterElementI(vector<int>& nums) {
if (nums.empty()) return 0;
stack<int> st;
int res = 0;
for (int val : nums) {
while (!st.empty() && st.top() < val) {
res = max(res, val - st.top());
st.pop();
}
st.push(val);
}
return res > 0 ? res : st.size();
}
};class Solution:
def next_greater_element_i(self, nums, *args) -> object:
# Optimal monotonic-stack solution
# Time: O(n), Space: O(n)
if not nums:
return 0
stack = []
res = 0
for i, val in enumerate(nums):
while stack and stack[-1] < val:
prev = stack.pop()
res = max(res, val - prev)
stack.append(val)
return res if res > 0 else len(stack)var nextGreaterElementI = function(nums, ...args) {
if (!nums || !nums.length) return 0;
const stack = [];
let res = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < nums.length; i++) {
const val = nums[i];
while (stack.length && stack[stack.length - 1] < val) {
const prev = stack.pop();
res = Math.max(res, val - prev);
}
stack.push(val);
}
return res > 0 ? res : stack.length;
};Edge Cases to Watch
- Key recognition trigger: Next greater element in another array.
- Identical or duplicate values: invariants preserved without triggering infinite loops or incorrect bounds.
- Boundary constraints: handles negative values, large magnitudes, and extreme array limits seamlessly.
- Suboptimal inputs: runs strictly within the O(n) time budget without stack overflow or time limit exceeded.
Master the Monotonic Stack Pattern
Study the core invariant, step-by-step decision framework, and common interview traps for the Monotonic Stack pattern.
How to Recognize This Pattern
- Next greater element in another array
Complexity Analysis
Time Complexity
O(n)
Space Complexity
O(n)