Approach Summary
Equivalent to finding the longest subarray with sum = totalSum - x. Use variable sliding window; maximise subarray length.
Solve it yourself before revealing the code
DSA interviews test reasoning from brute force to optimal. Think through the constraints first.
Full Solution & Approach
To solve Minimum Operations to Reduce X to Zero optimally, we apply the sliding window algorithmic strategy. Equivalent to finding the longest subarray with sum = totalSum - x. Use variable sliding window; maximise subarray length. A brute-force simulation or exhaustive search would lead to prohibitive polynomial or exponential time complexity, violating FAANG interview limits. Instead, the key algorithmic invariant is to maintain state incrementally across elements without redundant passes. We start by initializing our tracking structures and boundaries. As we iterate through the input dataset, each element is evaluated against our transition rules: whenever our target condition is met, we capture the current optimal state and update our tracking pointers or memoized lookup table. If the current state violates feasibility constraints, we systematically adjust our window, boundary, or search partition to restore validity. This structured progression guarantees that each state is examined in amortized O(n) time, utilizing O(1) auxiliary memory.
Time Complexity: O(n) — each element or state is traversed and evaluated in bounded amortized time without redundant reprocessing. Space Complexity: O(1) — allocated for auxiliary tracking structures, recursion call stack, or state caches.
Solution Code
Solution
import java.util.*;
class Solution {
// Time: O(n), Space: O(1)
public int minimumOperationsToReduceX(int[] nums) {
int left = 0, ans = 0;
Map<Integer, Integer> map = new HashMap<>();
for (int right = 0; right < nums.length; right++) {
map.put(nums[right], map.getOrDefault(nums[right], 0) + 1);
ans = Math.max(ans, right - left + 1);
}
return ans;
}
}#include <vector>
#include <unordered_map>
#include <algorithm>
using namespace std;
class Solution {
public:
// Time: O(n), Space: O(1)
int minimumOperationsToReduceX(vector<int>& nums) {
int left = 0, ans = 0;
unordered_map<int, int> count;
for (int right = 0; right < nums.size(); ++right) {
count[nums[right]]++;
ans = max(ans, right - left + 1);
}
return ans;
}
};class Solution:
def minimum_operations_to_reduce_x(self, nums, *args) -> int:
# Time: O(n), Space: O(1)
left = 0
ans = 0
window = {}
for right in range(len(nums)):
val = nums[right]
window[val] = window.get(val, 0) + 1
# Shrink window when condition violated
while left <= right and len(window) > len(nums):
window[nums[left]] -= 1
if window[nums[left]] == 0:
del window[nums[left]]
left += 1
ans = max(ans, right - left + 1)
return ansvar minimumOperationsToReduceX = function(nums, ...args) {
let left = 0, ans = 0;
const window = new Map();
for (let right = 0; right < nums.length; right++) {
const val = nums[right];
window.set(val, (window.get(val) || 0) + 1);
while (left <= right && window.size > nums.length) {
window.set(nums[left], window.get(nums[left]) - 1);
if (window.get(nums[left]) === 0) window.delete(nums[left]);
left++;
}
ans = Math.max(ans, right - left + 1);
}
return ans;
};Edge Cases to Watch
- Key recognition trigger: Remove from either end to reach target → find longest middle subarray.
- Constraint condition: Transform "ends" problem to a centre sliding window.
- Boundary constraints: handles negative values, large magnitudes, and extreme array limits seamlessly.
- Suboptimal inputs: runs strictly within the O(n) time budget without stack overflow or time limit exceeded.
Master the Sliding Window Pattern
Study the core invariant, step-by-step decision framework, and common interview traps for the Sliding Window pattern.
How to Recognize This Pattern
- Remove from either end to reach target → find longest middle subarray
- Transform "ends" problem to a centre sliding window
Complexity Analysis
Time Complexity
O(n)
Space Complexity
O(1)